The Effectiveness Profile

Self-improvement &
Professional-development Diagnostic

Version 4.2.1   5/27/2005

 
 
secure online expert-system software
for prioritizing
self-improvement & professional-development focus
 
 
 

Self-analysis
 
General Interpretation

Note:
The full manual is now available free of charge online from the Effectiveness Profile Home Page. The following information is excerpted from the manual. For additional detail, get the manual.

Understanding the Effectiveness Profile's Content
Interpreting the Effectiveness Profile

 
Understanding the Effectiveness Profile's Content

The Effectiveness Profile is a visual representation of a person's internal conflicts. It easily identifies one's most extreme inner conflict from among the attributes measured, and from there it can be used to identify one's "Single Biggest Problem" (SBP). The SBP is used to define a self- or professional-development program that focuses on the most important thing first.

Note: the Effectiveness Profile is NOT definitional: unlike so many psychological exams and tests, it does not say that one "is" a certain way and then seek to help one adjust and be successful within those constraints. Instead, it merely says where one is at the moment of filling it out. The optional Analysis and Strategy Consultation is focused entirely on how to correct the imbalances the Profile identifies. And while the path we take with you depends on whether you are a personal-improvement or a business client (or both!), non-coercively remedying inner conflict and disorientation and counter-productive personal and professional behavior, is our specialty.

There are two main areas in the profile. The Titles area, to the left, lists the names of the six Categories and twenty Attributes measured by the program. The Graph area, to the right presents a vertical "Exceptions Graph" that shows the relationships between the various Categories and Attributed measured. The BaseLine is calculated from the average of the results for all of the Attributes.

Following the names of the Categories and Attributes in the Titles area of the graph are numbers representing the degree of departure of each category and attribute from the Baseline. The baseline score is given below the Titles list, and the Baseline itself is indicated on the graph as the vertical "solid" line from which all the scores run left or right.

These numbers are neither positive nor negative; they merely provide calculation values for the horizontal lines between the Baseline and any particular category or attribute's result. In fact, too much departure from the Baseline in either direction is problematic. The numbers can be added together when comparing results across the baseline from each other, as we will discuss below.

In some cases there will be no number. This can occur when the result is equal to the BaseLine, in which case you will find an equals symbol instead. It can also occur when too few responses are given to the set of statements behind a particular Attribute, in which case you will see a hyphen instead.

The Graph area of the Effectiveness Profile incorporates several features in addition to the actual Attribute scores.

     BaseLine: the vertical "solid" line from which all the scores run left or right. It corresponds to the baseline number given at the bottom of the Titles area.

     Inhibited - Impelled: scores to the left of the baseline indicate inhibitions, things one has reservations about or difficulty doing. Scores to the right of the baseline indicate impulses, areas in which one is too quick to action or talents upon which one relies too much.

     XSMm-mMSX: one's inhibitions and impulses are mild, Moderate, Strong or Extreme. These letters rest above "Intensity Divisions" marked by ":" in rows above/across from each Category name. Each Intensity Division is 8 points across. Thus if one has a score of 14, either Inhibited or Impelled, one is mildly affected in that trait. A score between 24 and 32 indicates a Strong intensity.

     Category Scores: the first indicator in each category section of the graph is a number, indicating the average of that category's attributes. Thus categories may also be interpreted as general inhibitions and impulsions. Since category interpretation is secondary to attribute focus, there are no lines connecting the category indicators back to the Baseline.

Return to Document Contents
Home    (Or, use browser's Back button to return to Profile)

 

Interpreting the Effectiveness Profile

Interpreting the Effectiveness Profile is a matter of understanding intensities and extrapolating reactionary behaviors from them.

To the degree (intensity) one is inhibited, one has difficulty performing. To the degree one is impelled, one has difficulty restraining oneself. In fact, as the intensities enforcing one's inhibitions and impulsions increase through Strong and into Extreme, one acts or fails to act without thinking and cannot find "the reason" through casual conscious thought.

Note that simply doing the Effectiveness Profile without in-depth analysis and a follow-up program will not give one the reasons either: it will only provide insight into the patterns of one's counter-productive and destructive behaviors. That may be quite sufficient for mild and even Moderate intensity problems, which can often be overcome by force of will, if one is willing to work that hard and pay that much attention, a very real distraction from one's focus on one's objectives in any case.

The good news is that through the acute insight gained in a proper interpretation of the profile and subsequent development of a corrective program many so-called psychologically-based barriers may be set up for quick removal, depending on the corrective technology that is applied. (See below, How to get an In-Depth Analysis, for more on this.)

The most intense impulsion plays against the most intense inhibition to give rise to automatic solutions which then bind one into certain roles and away from others.

For obvious example, Inhibited Listening - Impelled Speaking; this combination results in one thinking one already knows what others are saying, and talking prematurely or even out of turn. Here one can be expected to be thinking ahead and not really hearing what others are saying, interrupting, or just lecturing. In business, two of the common symptoms of this combination are reverse delegation by management who do the work themselves instead of build their people into competence, and lost sales by salespeople who are not attuned to their prospects and customers. In parenting it's being overbearing, in friendships pushy, and in politics, meddlesome.

A slightly less obvious but equally common example is Inhibited Integrity - Impelled Assertiveness. Here, one is impelled to act but restrained from considering the moral and/or legal implications. This is where the slogan, "Whatever it takes," puts the lie to cultivating or hiring for assertiveness as a primary value.

An even less-obvious example is the reverse: Inhibited Assertiveness - Impelled Integrity. This is a person who does not act out of an apparent excessive concern, but who is actually unconsciously relying on his high sense of ethics to justify his inhibition.

This last example leads to a very important point, both in interpreting the Effectiveness Profile and in understanding the biggest mistake in our post-secondary educational system.

People tend to find refuge in their "strengths" and use them as compensators in avoiding their "weaknesses". Great careers may be built on the power of an intense impulsion, as with Speaking leading to success in politics. However, those careers are never as fulfilling as they would be if the individuals pursuing them were not also haunted by secret "failings". Or not-so-secret, depending on circumstances. Thus the plague of management and politics world-wide: we tend to reward smooth talkers with promotions and elections, and too often fail to attend to the counter-balancing inhibitions that undermine their potential benevolent success. Worse, our educational system is designed to maximize one's so-called strengths at the expense of neglecting the correction or at least the stabilization of so-called weaknesses. The result of this is that one becomes "trained into" an operating basis which, however powerful the position it leads to may be, does not include the resources to break out, but retains all one's inhibitions and magnifies one's impulsions.

The Effectiveness Profile is successfully interpreted by applying two factors. First, an accurate comprehension of what each attribute means and how it manifests as inhibited or impulsive. Second, experience built on the feedback of people who have done the Profile and gone through in-depth discussion of how the various scores and combinations manifest in moment-to-moment and ongoing situations.

This is as far as this website alone can take you at this point in time and the development of the PHP version of the Effectiveness Profile. The Visual-Basic version used by our consultants goes one step further, to provide an expert-system analysis of the most intensely opposed pair of attributes. We hope to bring this PHP version up to that point soon.

Beyond all this, there are the Written Synopsis and the Analysis & Strategy Consultation. Follow the "getting an in-depth analysis" link on our home page.

Return to Document Contents
Home    (Or, use your browser's Back button to return to Effectiveness Profile Home Page


Website and contents copyright © 1989-2006 by ASC Missions Group, ntc.
"Effectiveness Profile" is a trademark of ASC Missions Group, ntc.
"Self-improvement & Professional-development Diagnostic" is a service mark of ASC Missions Group, ntc.